http://www.artisthideout.com/2006/10/imagekind-review/ Inspiration for Artists Tue, 08 Jul 2008 00:35:02 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 http://www.artisthideout.com/2006/10/imagekind-review/comment-page-1/#comment-465 Ara Witmer Sun, 15 Jul 2007 17:31:47 +0000 http://www.artisthideout.com/imagekind-review/#comment-465 I have a new free gallery at imagekind. There is a maximum of 24 images allowed in the free galleries. If I want more images displayed or more galleries, I can always upgrade to a paid service at any time. All my images can be purchased framed or unframed right now. I think this is a pretty good deal for the artist or photographer just starting out. Very professional looking website, and easy to use too. :) I have a new free gallery at imagekind. There is a maximum of 24 images allowed in the free galleries. If I want more images displayed or more galleries, I can always upgrade to a paid service at any time. All my images can be purchased framed or unframed right now. I think this is a pretty good deal for the artist or photographer just starting out. Very professional looking website, and easy to use too.

]]> http://www.artisthideout.com/2006/10/imagekind-review/comment-page-1/#comment-92 ImageKind - A new way for Artists to Exhibit and Sell Art Online Thu, 30 Nov 2006 12:20:44 +0000 http://www.artisthideout.com/imagekind-review/#comment-92 [...] According to Artist Hideout’s post on ImageKind, you need three images to open your gallery to the public. I didn’t try this out myself, but I’ll take his word for it. This means that to make full-size, good, quality prints, you’ll need to pay a monthly fee for more server space. This, of course, kind of tarnishes the whole “free” aspect of ImageKind if it truly is the case. [...] [...] According to Artist Hideout’s post on ImageKind, you need three images to open your gallery to the public. I didn’t try this out myself, but I’ll take his word for it. This means that to make full-size, good, quality prints, you’ll need to pay a monthly fee for more server space. This, of course, kind of tarnishes the whole “free” aspect of ImageKind if it truly is the case. [...]

]]>